Joined
·
597 Posts
This is my first attempt to post a series of pictures of one of my Lugers, and this one is no beauty. However, according to "Imperial Lugers" it is pretty uncommon. Jan states in "Imperial Lugers" that . .
"a few 1914 DWM Lugers in the 8000a to 9400a serial range bearing the C/X C/X C/X acceptance stamps lack a stock lug" without estimating the total production. This serial number range suggests a production run of perhaps 1400 Lugers.
According to "Imperial Lugers" "This Luger bears the same C/X C/X C/X Army inspections stamps as found on 1908 Commercial Army Lugers." I wonder what the common element was here, other than the obvious, and if there is any background history on these guns.
I would be interested in hearing from others who own one of these.
Download Attachment:
1914 DWM, SN8754a Receiver Proofs.jpg
61.5 KB
Download Attachment:
1914 DWM, SN8754a - Left Side.jpg
87.88 KB
Download Attachment:
1914 DWM, SN8754a - Right Side.jpg
72.29 KB
The gun is pretty rough but is all matching and shows no signs of tampering, so I am pretty sure that it is authentic.
The roughest part is the side plate. It appears that the gun must have rested on the left side in a rust-promoting environment for some time. The pitting here is unfortunate, but it is part of the gun's history.
Download Attachment:
1914 DWM, SN8754a Side Plate.jpg
129.81 KB
"a few 1914 DWM Lugers in the 8000a to 9400a serial range bearing the C/X C/X C/X acceptance stamps lack a stock lug" without estimating the total production. This serial number range suggests a production run of perhaps 1400 Lugers.
According to "Imperial Lugers" "This Luger bears the same C/X C/X C/X Army inspections stamps as found on 1908 Commercial Army Lugers." I wonder what the common element was here, other than the obvious, and if there is any background history on these guns.
I would be interested in hearing from others who own one of these.
Download Attachment:

61.5 KB
Download Attachment:

87.88 KB
Download Attachment:

72.29 KB
The gun is pretty rough but is all matching and shows no signs of tampering, so I am pretty sure that it is authentic.
The roughest part is the side plate. It appears that the gun must have rested on the left side in a rust-promoting environment for some time. The pitting here is unfortunate, but it is part of the gun's history.
Download Attachment:

129.81 KB